Clinical Diagnosis of Temporal Myopia: A Civilizational Pathology

Executive Summary: The Etiology of the Present

The following clinical report constitutes a comprehensive diagnostic analysis of "Temporal Myopia," a pervasive civilizational pathology characterized by a systemic and progressive inability to perceive, value, or plan for the long-term future. This condition is not merely a metaphor for poor planning or a cultural preference for immediacy; it is a distinct neuro-sociological disorder rooted in specific cognitive biases, amplified by accelerating social structures, and reinforced by economic incentives that prioritize immediate feedback over sustainable duration. The "The Present in Public" initiative is evaluated herein not merely as an artistic or social experiment, but as a necessary therapeutic intervention designed to remediate the cognitive and physiological estrangement from deep time.

The analysis synthesizes evidence from four distinct but clear domains: the neuroscience of hyperbolic discounting and self-continuity; the sociology of acceleration and the "famine of time"; the physiological markers of stress induced by "Clock Time" versus "Event Time"; and the economic destruction wrought by "short-termism" and industrial tooling failures. The findings indicate that Temporal Myopia is degenerative. Without intervention—specifically through mechanisms that visualize the future, decouple activity from the tyranny of the clock, and reduce the frequency of informational feedback—the pathology leads to "frenetic standstill," a state of high kinetic energy but zero distinct forward progress, resulting in civilizational burnout and the erosion of long-term value.

1. The Neurocognitive Etiology: The Stranger in the Prefrontal Cortex

The diagnosis of Temporal Myopia begins at the level of the individual neural architecture. To understand why a civilization fails to plan for its survival, one must first understand the specific failures of the human brain to inhabit its own future. The research indicates that the human brain is not naturally wired for "long-termism"; rather, it is wired for immediate survival, and the mechanisms required to bridge the gap between "now" and "then" are evolutionarily recent, fragile, and easily disrupted by the tooling of modern life.

1.1 Hyperbolic Discounting and the Valuation Collapse

At the core of the cognitive dysfunction is "hyperbolic discounting," a bias where individuals disproportionately value immediate rewards over future benefits, even when the future benefits are rationally superior.1 Classical economic models often assume "exponential discounting," where the value of a future reward declines at a steady, consistent rate over time. However, empirical evidence from behavioral economics and neuroscience reveals that human discounting is hyperbolic—the discount curve is not a gentle slope but a precipitous cliff. A reward available "now" is valued disproportionately higher than a reward available "later," even if the "later" reward is significantly larger.2

This phenomenon creates a "preference reversal" over time. An individual might rationally prefer receiving $100 in 31 days over $50 in 30 days (viewing both as "future" events). However, when 30 days elapse and the choice becomes $50 today vs. $100 tomorrow, the preference often flips to the immediate $50.2 The proximity of the immediate reward hijacks the decision-making process, overriding the executive function's long-term plan. This volatility of preference makes long-term policy—such as climate action or infrastructure investment—politically fragile; the public may support the abstract idea of future sacrifice, but when the moment of cost arrives, the "present bias" overrides the commitment.

The mechanism of hyperbolic discounting is not a random error but a specific feature of the brain's valuation system, heavily influenced by the "psychological distance" of the reward.3 As the temporal distance increases, the vividness of the reward decreases, and the brain's emotional valuation centers (such as the ventral striatum) fail to activate with the same intensity as they do for immediate stimuli. This creates a "valuation gap" that is the primary lesion of Temporal Myopia.

1.2 Neural Estrangement: The Future Self as Stranger

The most profound insight into the mechanics of Temporal Myopia comes from the research of Dr. Hal Hershfield and colleagues regarding "Future Self-Continuity".4 This research challenges the philosophical assumption of personal identity as a continuous state. Instead, it supports the view that the "self" is a collection of distinct identities that overlap over time. The "Current Self" and the "Future Self" may share a body, but neurologically, they are distinct entities.

Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), researchers have mapped this estrangement. When subjects act in the scanner and think about their "Current Self," there is high activation in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and the rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC)—regions heavily implicated in self-referential processing and introspection. However, when these same subjects are asked to think about their "Future Self" (e.g., ten years hence), the activation in the mPFC drops significantly. Crucially, the neural pattern observed when thinking about the Future Self is nearly identical to the pattern observed when the subject thinks about a stranger (e.g., Matt Damon or a random person).4

This finding provides the clinical basis for the "empathy gap" inherent in Temporal Myopia. When an individual is asked to save for retirement, reduce carbon emissions, or invest in preventative health, they are not processing this as "delayed gratification" for themselves. Neurologically, they are processing it as an act of altruism for a stranger.6 We fail to care for our future because, to our brains, the beneficiary of that care is not "us." This "neural estrangement" explains why knowledge is insufficient for behavioral change; knowing that smoking is bad for the "Future Self" does not motivate the "Current Self" if the two are not psychologically connected.

1.3 The Vividness Intervention: Bridging the Gap

If the pathology is estrangement, the therapeutic intervention is "vividness." The brain relies on vivid, sensory details to tag concepts with emotional reality. The present is inherently vivid—sensory, immediate, and tangible. The future is abstract, colorless, and theoretical. Research confirms that when the future self is viewed in vivid, realistic terms, and seen in a positive light, the rate of discounting decreases.4

Hershfield’s experiments utilizing immersive Virtual Reality (VR) and age-progression technology provide a critical validation for the "The Present in Public" initiative’s focus on visualization. In these studies, participants entered a virtual room and stood in front of a mirror.

• Control Group: Interacted with a digital avatar of their current self.

• Experimental Group: Interacted with a digitally aged avatar (gray hair, wrinkles) that moved in sync with their real body.

The results were statistically significant: those who interacted with their vivid, aged future self allocated approximately twice as much money to a hypothetical retirement fund compared to the control group.6 The visual interaction forced the brain to recognize the continuity between the "Now" and the "Then," bridging the empathy gap. Even lower-fidelity interventions, such as writing a letter to one's future self or viewing an age-progressed photograph, have been shown to reduce unethical behavior and increase delayed gratification.7 This suggests that the "tooling" of visualization is a viable treatment for the cognitive deficit of myopia.

1.4 Temporal Framing: The Date/Delay Effect

The language and units used to frame time also act as cognitive constraints. Research into the "date/delay effect" indicates that the framing of a time interval significantly alters patience and discounting rates. When time is presented as a specific calendar date (e.g., "October 14") rather than a delay unit (e.g., "in 180 days"), individuals exhibit less impulsive behavior and lower discount rates.9

The mechanism here is "differential time estimation." A calendar date triggers episodic memory and planning regions in the brain (such as the precuneus and posterior cingulate cortex), allowing the individual to "inhabit" that specific moment in their mental calendar.9 A "delay unit," by contrast, triggers calculation and patience fatigue; it is a cost to be endured rather than a destination to be reached. This finding has profound implications for public communication: aiming for "2050" (a date) is more effective than planning for "the next 30 years" (a delay).

Furthermore, the "unit effect" plays a role. Describing wait times in larger units (e.g., months vs. days) can shrink the perceived duration via the numerosity heuristic (3 is smaller than 90), boosting patience for hedonic rewards.11 This suggests that "The Present in Public" must utilize specific temporal anchors—dates and concrete visualizations—rather than abstract durations to effectively combat myopia.

---

2. The Sociological Vector: Social Acceleration and the Famine of Time

While cognitive science explains the individual susceptibility to Temporal Myopia, the sociologist Hartmut Rosa provides the etiology of the environmental factors that amplify this pathology to a civilizational level. Rosa identifies "Social Acceleration" not merely as the speed at which things move, but as the defining logic of late modernity—a totalitarian force that dictates the rhythm of all social, economic, and political life.12

2.1 The Three Motors of Acceleration

Rosa creates a taxonomy of acceleration, identifying three distinct but self-reinforcing dimensions that drive the modern experience of time.13

2.1.1 Technological Acceleration

This is the most visible form: the intentional speed-up of goal-directed processes, particularly in transport, communication, and production. Driven by the economic imperative "time is money," this form of acceleration is theoretically intended to "save time".14 However, empirical observation reveals a paradox: as the speed of these processes increases, the amount of free time available decreases. The "saved time" is not banked; it is immediately reinvested in increased volume.

2.1.2 Acceleration of Social Change

This dimension refers to the rate at which social structures, knowledge, and relationships become obsolete. Rosa describes this as the "contraction of the present".14 The "present" is defined as the span of time in which the conditions of action remain stable enough to allow for valid planning.

• Early Modernity: Change was intergenerational. The world of the son was largely the world of the father.

• Classical Modernity: Change was generational. Each generation faced a new world, but conditions remained stable within a lifespan.

• Late Modernity: Change is intragenerational. Structures change faster than a single lifespan.15 Skills learned in university are obsolete by age 30; family structures and jobs are fluid. This renders "experience" less valuable and "long-term planning" cognitively dissonant, as the variables of the plan are guaranteed to change.

2.1.3 Acceleration of the Pace of Life

This is the subjective and objective manifestation of the first two motors. Subjectively, it is the feeling of "Time Famine"—the sense of being perpetually rushed. Objectively, it is the increase in the number of action episodes per unit of time.12 We simply do more things in an hour than we did fifty years ago. This compression of action reduces the "dwell time" on any single event, preventing the depth of engagement required for resonance or long-term thinking.

2.2 The Paradox of the Time Famine

A central symptom of Temporal Myopia is the "famine of time" amidst an abundance of time-saving technology. The logic of technological acceleration posits that faster devices should liberate free time. However, Rosa argues that the rate of production and communication has outpaced the rate of consumption and processing.15

• The E-mail Paradox: We send emails faster than letters, but the volume of correspondence has increased so exponentially that the total time dedicated to communication has expanded, not contracted.15

• Dynamic Stabilization: This creates a "slippery slope" syndrome. Modern societies must accelerate simply to remain stable.12 A company must innovate faster just to maintain market share; a worker must upskill constantly just to keep their job. This structural necessity to accelerate creates a "frenetic standstill"—a state where everything moves at breakneck speed, yet no meaningful narrative or historical progress is achieved.15

2.3 Quantifying the Frenzy: Empirical Evidence of Acceleration

The acceleration of the pace of life is not merely an anecdotal feeling; it is empirically measurable in the "tooling" of our culture.

2.3.1 The Motorized Legislator: Speech Rates

Analysis of parliamentary debates indicates a startling physiological adaptation to the pressure of time. The speed with which speeches are delivered in parliament has risen by approximately 50% since 1945.16 This "motorized legislation" reflects the need to compress more information into fixed temporal windows. However, this compression comes at a cost: it reduces the time available for deliberation, reflection, pause, and nuance—the essential components of long-term political thinking. The faster the speech, the more reactive and less "resonant" the discourse becomes.

2.3.2 The Collapse of Visual Attention: Cinematic Pacing

The "Average Shot Length" (ASL) in English-language films serves as a proxy for the collective visual attention span. The data reveals a collapse in the duration of the visual "moment."

• 1930: ~12 seconds per shot.

• 2010: ~2.5 seconds per shot.17

• Modern Action: Some films now average under 2 seconds per shot.18

This decrease in shot length correlates with a decrease in the audience's ability to engage in "ma" (the Japanese concept of negative space or pause).19 The brain is forced into a state of constant, reactive alert (the "orienting response") rather than contemplative engagement. This "staccato" rhythm conditions the neural pathways to expect hyper-stimulus and rapid transitions, making the "slow time" of nature or deep thought feel biologically uncomfortable.18

2.3.3 The Fragmented Workplace

The modern workplace is the engine room of acceleration. Data indicates that the average office worker is interrupted every 3 minutes, with some studies suggesting interruptions as frequent as every 2 minutes.20

• Refocusing Cost: It takes an average of 23 minutes to fully regain focus after a distraction.20

• Continuous Partial Attention: Most workers never reach deep focus; they operate in a state of "continuous partial attention".22 This fragmentation of time makes "deep work" or long-term strategic thinking structurally impossible, confining the worker's cognitive horizon to the immediate reactive loop. The "Present" becomes a series of disjointed instants rather than a coherent flow.

---

3. The Physiological Cost: Metabolic Time vs. Industrial Time

Temporal Myopia is not just a mental state; it is a physical injury. The imposition of "acceleration" and "Clock Time" onto a biological organism evolved for "Event Time" creates a chronic conflict, manifesting as stress, disease, and cognitive degradation. The body keeps the score of the time famine.

3.1 Clock Time vs. Event Time: The Agency Gap

Researchers Avnet and Sellier distinguish between two fundamental modes of temporal organization.23

• Event Time: Behavior is dictated by the natural completion of a task or a physiological state (e.g., "Lunch is when I am hungry," "The meeting ends when the decision is made"). This is the "natural" mode, prioritized for effectiveness and meaning.

• Clock Time: Behavior is dictated by an external schedule (e.g., "Lunch is at 12:00," "The meeting ends at 11:00"). This is the "industrial" mode, prioritized for efficiency and coordination.

While Clock Time is necessary for complex coordination, its dominance has severe psychological costs. Research indicates that reliance on Clock Time compromises the ability to savor positive emotions.23 When an individual checks the clock during a positive experience, they are mentally exiting the experience to assess its duration, severing the connection to the moment.

Furthermore, Clock Time reduces the sense of internal control.25 Clock-timers attribute causality to the external schedule rather than their own agency ("I stopped because it was 5:00," not "I stopped because I was done"). This "locus of control" shift is associated with higher anxiety and lower well-being. The "Present in Public" initiative, by creating spaces that prioritize Event Time (e.g., spaces without visible clocks, focused on task completion or social connection), acts as a physiological intervention to restore agency.

3.2 The Neuroendocrinology of "Time Urgency"

The subjective feeling of "time pressure" is a potent biological toxin. The "Type A" behavior pattern, characterized prominently by time urgency and impatience, was one of the first psychological traits linked to cardiovascular disease.26 The mechanism is the "beta-adrenergic" drive.

Beta-Adrenergic Activation:

Competition and time-pressured tasks trigger specific physiological responses: increases in blood pressure, heart rate, and a shortening of the pre-ejection period (a marker of sympathetic nervous system activation).27 While this response is adaptive for acute physical threats (running from a predator), it is maladaptive for chronic social stressors (meeting a deadline).

The Cortisol Response:

The Trier Social Stress Test (TSST), the gold standard for inducing stress in laboratory settings, confirms that uncontrollability and social-evaluative threat are the most potent triggers of the HPA axis (Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal), leading to the release of cortisol.28 Time pressure creates a state of functional uncontrollability—the demands of the clock exceed the resources of the individual.

• Impact on Decision Making: High cortisol levels induced by stress significantly impair decision-making quality, particularly when accompanied by experienced time pressure.29 The brain switches resources from the prefrontal cortex (executive function, long-term planning) to the amygdala (reactive, short-term survival). We literally become less capable of complex thought when we are rushed.

3.3 Allostatic Load: The Cumulative Cost

The concept of Allostatic Load 30 explains the long-term damage of this chronic activation. "Allostasis" is the process of adapting to acute stress (e.g., a spike in cortisol to handle a crisis). "Allostatic Load" is the cumulative wear and tear on the body when the stress response is never fully turned off.

• The Famine Effect: The "famine of time" ensures that the HPA axis remains chronically activated. This leads to immune suppression, cardiovascular damage, and cognitive decline.30 The "acceleration" of society is thus physically inscribed on the bodies of its citizens as disease.

3.4 Chronobiology and Nature: The Restoration of Time

The human organism evolved in a "circannual" and "circadian" environment, regulated by the slow cycles of light and seasons.31 The imposition of industrial "machine time" disrupts these biological oscillators, leading to disorders like insomnia and anxiety.

Removing the Clock:

Clinical interventions in mental health wards provide a striking counter-intuitive finding: removing clocks from the ward can actually reduce patient insomnia and anxiety.32 The constant visibility of time creates a feedback loop of surveillance and "deadline stress" that inhibits the parasympathetic nervous system required for rest. This suggests that "time awareness" itself can be a stressor.

Biophilia as Time Anchor:

Nature operates inherently on Event Time. Research links "Connection to Nature" with "Pro-Environmental Behavior" and a stronger sense of future concern.34 Exposure to nature elicits awe, a self-transcendent emotion that expands the perception of time availability and mediates the link between nature and well-being.35 By integrating nature into public spaces, "The Present in Public" can provide "temporal anchors" that reset the biological clock to a slower, more sustainable rhythm.

---

4. The Economic Tooling Failure: Value Destruction through Efficiency

The final dimension of the diagnosis is economic. Our financial and industrial tools, designed for "efficiency," have become engines of value destruction through the mechanism of Short-Termism. The logic of the market, which should allocate resources efficiently over time, has become pathologically myopic.

4.1 The Tragedy of the Horizon

Mark Carney, former Governor of the Bank of England, explicitly identified this pathology as the "Tragedy of the Horizon".37 The financial system faces risks—specifically climate change—that impose catastrophic costs. However, these risks lie beyond the standard horizon of financial technocracy (central bank mandates, corporate reporting cycles, political terms).

• The Mismatch: The business cycle is 2-3 years. The credit cycle is ~10 years. The climate cycle is decades/centuries. Because the "horizon" of the market is shorter than the horizon of the risk, the risk is priced at zero.

• Tooling Failure: This is not a failure of "greed" but a failure of "measurement." The tools (Discounted Cash Flow models, Value-at-Risk) are mathematically incapable of seeing beyond the horizon, creating a systemic blindness to the future.38

4.2 Myopic Loss Aversion: The Frequency Trap

Behavioral economics identifies "Myopic Loss Aversion" (MLA) as the cognitive driver of this financial pathology.39 MLA combines two concepts:

1. Loss Aversion: Humans feel the pain of a loss approximately twice as intensely as the pleasure of an equivalent gain.

2. Mental Accounting (Frequency): The frequency with which an individual evaluates their position.

The Frequency Effect Experiment:

Researchers Gneezy and Potters 39 demonstrated this effect through a rigorous experiment. Subjects were given an endowment and asked to bet on a lottery with a positive expected value (it was rational to bet).

• Condition A (High Frequency): Subjects received feedback and made investment choices after every single round.

• Condition B (Low Frequency): Subjects received feedback and made choices only after every three rounds.

The Result: Subjects in the Low Frequency condition invested significantly more (taking appropriate long-term risk) and earned significantly more money than those in the High Frequency condition.39

• The Mechanism: High-frequency feedback exposes the investor to the "noise" of short-term volatility. Seeing a loss in Round 1 triggers loss aversion, causing them to retreat. Low-frequency feedback allows the "law of large numbers" to smooth out the noise, making the long-term upward trend visible.

• Implication for "The Present in Public": This provides a damning critique of the "transparency" doctrine that demands real-time data for everything. Too much information, delivered too frequently, destroys long-term value. The "tooling" of the modern dashboard—providing real-time, tick-by-tick data—is a design flaw that triggers MLA.

4.3 Quarterly Capitalism and the Productivity Paradox

The obsession with "efficiency"—defined as speed and volume of output—has reached a point of diminishing returns, becoming a destroyer of value.

• Quarterly Capitalism: The pressure for quarterly earnings reports drives "managerial myopia." Research indicates that mandatory quarterly reporting increases earnings management (manipulation), fosters myopic behavior, and reduces long-term investment in R&D and CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility).42 When firms are protected from short-term takeover threats or reporting requirements, they invest more in long-term sustainability.44

• Greenwashing: Firms prioritizing short-term ESG scores often engage in "symbolic" sustainability (low-cost, short-term projects like LED lights) rather than "substantive" transformation (long-term R&D), because the short-term projects pay off within the "horizon" of the current executive tenure.45

• Cost of Interruptions: The "interrupt-driven" workplace, designed for rapid response, costs the UK economy £488 billion and US businesses an estimated $650 billion annually in lost productivity.20 We have engineered a system of "continuous partial attention" that actively destroys the cognitive capacity required for innovation.

---

5. Synthesis and Recommendations: The Present in Public as Clinical Intervention

The diagnosis is clear: Temporal Myopia is a systemic autoimmune disorder of modernity. The very tools developed to master time (clocks, high-speed exchange, quarterly reports) have triggered a pathological feedback loop that consumes the future to feed the immediate present. The brain's natural difficulty in empathizing with the future self is ruthlessly exploited by an accelerationist culture that offers no "temporal anchors" for long-term thinking.

Validation of "The Present in Public" Initiative

The "The Present in Public" initiative is validated by this research not as an aesthetic luxury, but as a cognitive and physiological necessity. To cure Temporal Myopia, the intervention must operate on the specific mechanisms identified above.

5.1 Therapeutic Design Principles

5.2 Specific Recommendations for Implementation

1. Public Visualization of Deep Time: Implement public installations that visualize the community's future state with the same vividness as the present. This counters the "stranger" effect and activates "Future Self-Continuity".6

2. The "Date" Standard: Shift public communication from "delay units" (e.g., "in 20 years") to "calendar dates" (e.g., "The Year 2044"). This utilizes the "Date/Delay Effect" to reduce discounting and increase patience.9

3. Nature Integration: Prioritize the integration of natural elements ("Green/Blue Spaces") into public design not just for aesthetics, but as "chronobiological anchors" that induce awe and restore "Event Time" rhythms.34

4. Low-Frequency Governance: Advocate for and implement reporting structures that prioritize long-term horizons over short-term transparency. Resist the urge for real-time dashboards in favor of meaningful, slower feedback loops that mitigate Myopic Loss Aversion.39

In conclusion, Temporal Myopia is a tooling failure of our civilization's temporal infrastructure. "The Present in Public" represents a re-tooling—a deliberate design of social space to extend the event horizon of the collective mind, allowing us to perceive, inhabit, and care for the future once again.

---

Detailed Evidence Tables

Table 1: Cognitive & Neural Evidence

Table 2: Sociological & Cultural Evidence

Table 3: Physiological & Economic Evidence

Works cited

1. Definition, Example & How Hyperbolic Discounting Works - Newristics, accessed December 31, 2025, https://newristics.com/heuristics-biases/hyperbolic-discounting

2. Hyperbolic Discounting - The Decision Lab, accessed December 31, 2025, https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/hyperbolic-discounting

3. How Hyperbolic Discounting Shapes Decisions and What it Means for Brands, accessed December 31, 2025, https://www.cognitionagency.co.uk/blog/hyperbolic-discounting

4. Future self-continuity: how conceptions of the future self transform intertemporal choice - NIH, accessed December 31, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3764505/

5. Future self-continuity: How conceptions of the future self transform intertemporal choice, accessed December 31, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51738840_Future_self-continuity_How_conceptions_of_the_future_self_transform_intertemporal_choice

6. The stranger within: Connecting with our future selves - Newsroom | UCLA, accessed December 31, 2025, https://newsroom.ucla.edu/stories/the-stranger-within-connecting-with-our-future-selves

7. Advancing the Study of Using Future-Self Images to Alter Behavior ..., accessed December 31, 2025, https://anderson-review.ucla.edu/vividness/

8. Connection to Future Self Is Key to Retirement Readiness - Cadence Financial Management, accessed December 31, 2025, https://www.financialcadence.com/insights-blog/2023/7/1/connection-to-future-self-is-key-to-retirement-readiness

9. The date/delay effect in intertemporal choice: A combined fMRI and eye‐tracking study - NIH, accessed December 31, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10893971/

10. Understanding the date–delay effect: demographic and behavioral insights in intertemporal choice - IDEAS/RePEc, accessed December 31, 2025, https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/decisn/v52y2025i3d10.1007_s40622-025-00428-0.html

11. The Influence of Wait Time Units on Patience in Intertemporal Choice - Scholar Commons, accessed December 31, 2025, https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4375&context=etd

12. Social acceleration - Wikipedia, accessed December 31, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_acceleration

13. Hartmut Rosa's Social Acceleration Theory: A New Critical Theory of Modernity - Medium, accessed December 31, 2025, https://medium.com/@s-blog/hartmut-rosas-social-acceleration-theory-a-new-theory-of-modernity-ac8ef9fef799

14. Book Review: Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity by Hartmut Rosa - LSE Blogs, accessed December 31, 2025, https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsereviewofbooks/2013/09/12/book-review-social-acceleration-a-new-theory-of-modernity/

15. On Hartmut Rosa and the acceleration of social change in modernity - JHI Blog, accessed December 31, 2025, https://www.jhiblog.org/2019/01/23/on-hartmut-rosa-and-the-acceleration-of-social-change-in-modernity/

16. A new approach to political time in Canada James Cairns, Ryerson University Presented at the 78, accessed December 31, 2025, https://cpsa-acsp.ca/papers-2009/Cairns.pdf

17. Evolution of movies - FlowingData, accessed December 31, 2025, https://flowingdata.com/2014/09/22/evolution-of-movies/

18. average shot length | Just TV - Jason Mittell, accessed December 31, 2025, https://justtv.wordpress.com/tag/average-shot-length/

19. when the movie's average shot length is more than literally 3 seconds : r/videos - Reddit, accessed December 31, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/1830ec7/when_the_movies_average_shot_length_is_more_than/

20. Workplace Interruptions: Their Impact and How to Manage Them | Careerminds, accessed December 31, 2025, https://careerminds.com/blog/workplace-interruptions-impact

21. Workplace interruptions cost UK economy GBP £488 billion each year - IT Brief UK, accessed December 31, 2025, https://itbrief.co.uk/story/workplace-interruptions-cost-uk-economy-gbp-488-billion-each-year

22. Are You a Self-Interrupter? - Nautilus Magazine, accessed December 31, 2025, https://nautil.us/are-you-a-self_interrupter-236623/

23. Is it better to live in 'clock time' or 'event time'? | Psyche Ideas, accessed December 31, 2025, https://psyche.co/ideas/is-it-better-to-live-in-clock-time-or-event-time

24. Clock Time Versus Event Time: Temporal Culture or Self-Regulation ..., accessed December 31, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228298452_Clock_Time_Versus_Event_Time_Temporal_Culture_or_Self-Regulation

25. So what if the clock strikes? Scheduling style, control, and well-being - PubMed, accessed December 31, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25347127/

26. Plasma ACTH and Cortisol Concentration of Coronary-Prone Sub jectsl MEYER FRIEDMAN, SANFORD 0. BYERS, AND RAY H. ROSENMAN In a n, accessed December 31, 2025, https://www.ebm-journal.org/journals/experimental-biology-and-medicine/articles/10.3181/00379727-140-36530/pdf

27. The effects of competition and competitiveness on cardiovascular activity - ResearchGate, accessed December 31, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231824457_The_effects_of_competition_and_competitiveness_on_cardiovascular_activity

28. Acute Stressors and Cortisol Responses: A Theoretical Integration and Synthesis of Laboratory Research - UW Department of Psychiatry, accessed December 31, 2025, https://www.psychiatry.wisc.edu/courses/Nitschke/seminar/dickerson_kemeny_metaanalysis%202004%20psych%20bull.pdf

29. Acute stress impairs decision-making at varying levels of decision complexity - PMC - NIH, accessed December 31, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12663459/

30. Chapter: 2 Biobehavioral Factors in Health and Disease - National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, accessed December 31, 2025, https://www.nationalacademies.org/read/9838/chapter/4

31. Wellness Design: Creating Spaces for Mental and Physical Health - Willow Alexander, accessed December 31, 2025, https://willowalexander.co.uk/howa-living/wellness-design-creating-spaces-for-mental-and-physical-health/

32. Insomnia - causes, symptoms and different types - Healthdirect, accessed December 31, 2025, https://www.healthdirect.gov.au/insomnia

33. Sherry Rose Pam Whitty “Where do we find the time to do this?” Struggling Against the Tyranny of Time, accessed December 31, 2025, https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/ajer/article/view/55410/42444

34. Time Spent in Nature Is Associated with Increased Pro-Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors - NIH, accessed December 31, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8305895/

35. Nature Exposure and Subjective Well-Being: The Mediating Roles of Connectedness to Nature and Awe - MDPI, accessed December 31, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5406

36. Awe Expands People's Perception of Time, Alters Decision Making, and Enhances Well-Being, accessed December 31, 2025, https://www.bauer.uh.edu/mrrudd/download/AweExpandsTimeAvailability.pdf

37. “Breaking the tragedy of the horizon” speech by Mark Carney, Governor of the Bank of England | Mainstreaming Climate in Financial Institutions, accessed December 31, 2025, https://www.mainstreamingclimate.org/resource/breaking-the-tragedy-of-the-horizon-speech-by-mark-carney-governor-of-the-bank-of-england/

38. Jakob Thomä on... the tragedy of the Tragedy of the Horizons speech - Responsible Investor, accessed December 31, 2025, https://www.responsible-investor.com/jakob-thoma-on-the-tragedy-of-the-tragedy-of-the-horizons-speech/

39. Myopic Loss Aversion under Ambiguity and Gender Effects - PMC, accessed December 31, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5156393/

40. Some (Mis)facts about Myopic Loss Aversion - AWS, accessed December 31, 2025, https://ho4out7of9.execute-api.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/prod/sites/default/files/2023-12/0615.pdf

41. How Sticky is Myopic Loss Aversion? Do Changes in Information Feedback and Investment Flexibility Affect Risk Taking Behavior? | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed December 31, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228225644_How_Sticky_is_Myopic_Loss_Aversion_Do_Changes_in_Information_Feedback_and_Investment_Flexibility_Affect_Risk_Taking_Behavior

42. Quarterly vs. Semiannual Reporting: A Cross-Market Analysis of Earnings Announcement Reactions in the US and Europe - MDPI, accessed December 31, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/4/207

43. Financial Reporting Frequency and Corporate Innovation | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed December 31, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346512466_Financial_Reporting_Frequency_and_Corporate_Innovation

44. Exploring the Debate on Short-Termism: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed December 31, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/29816580_Exploring_the_Debate_on_Short-Termism_A_Theoretical_and_Empirical_Analysis

45. Inside the blackbox of firm environmental efforts: Evidence from emissions reduction initiatives - EconStor, accessed December 31, 2025, https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/300682/1/1897324146.pdf

46. Undesired corporate sustainability practices under imperfect ESG rating scheme, accessed December 31, 2025, https://www.emerald.com/jal/article/47/5/665/1312113/Undesired-corporate-sustainability-practices-under